THE ARTICLE 29 OF D.LGS. N. 276 OF 2003 AND IT’S APPLICABLE PROBLEMS
With sentence no. 22728 of 4 October 2013, the Supreme Court, Employment Section ruled that the absence of joint liability for client company with regards to claims of the employee of the contracting company accuse at the end of the procurement contract. The event concerns an employee of a contracting company, after being fired, who had not received from the employer, payment in lieu of notice and had approached the contracting company to obtain what was owed based on this title.
RELEVANT ASPECTS ON ARBITRATION
On the 10th of July in Milan at the GI Group's auditorium it was held the conference on the positive outlook of arbitration relating to employment.The speakers that took part at the conference were Avv. Mauro Rubino Sammartano, President of the European Court of Arbitration Strasbourg, Avv. Mario Fusani, a labour law expert with many years of experience, Dr. Fabio Begini, National Secretary at UIL-UILCOM and Dr. Davide Patruno, Human resources manager at the Maxi Zoo Italia S.p.a – Fresssnapf Group.
RULING ON THE MINISTRY OF LABOUR No. 1/2013
The Ministry of Labor, as a result of a requisition for an opinion submitted by the associations of the cooperative movement AGCI, Confcooperative, Legacoop, provided, with the response n. 1/2013 of the 01.24.2013 ,
Clear separation between fixed-term contracts and administration
In order to understand the scope of the judgment of 11 April 2013 EU Court of Justice, a brief introduction has to be made.The case concerns an employee who had agreed to three successive contracts with Obiettivo Lavoro Spa on fixed-term employment, in virtue of which was made available to the Poste Italiane as postmen in order to provide for replacement of the missing personnel assigned to delivery service at the Campania region.
REMARKS AT THE DECREE EX ART. 99 L. F. OF THE COURT OF GENOA BETWEEN BANKRUPTCY AND FAMILY THERE ARE CONDITIONAL CREDITS
The Decree of the Court of Genoa that we are going to comment on, derives from origins of an opposition of insolvency of a bankruptcy.
THE DISMISSAL IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE
With this short description of framework there is of course the pretense to treat exhaustively the matter as complex as the systems of dismissal, in a comparative perspective.
EXTRACT FROM ORDINANCE NO. 19907 OF 2009 ISSUED BY THE EXAMINING MAGISTRATE GIUSEPPE DI SALVO OF SECTION III OF THE CIVIL COURT OF ROME
On the subject concerning the use of Arbitrator panels within associations I have the pleasure of sharing with you some reflections and I'm bringing them to your attention and hope may contribute to our company.
REMARKS OF THE JUDGMENT OF THE FIRST CIVIL SECTION OF SUPREME COURT NO. 18319 OF 2012 “THE SUPREME COURT DOES NOT WANT TO ARBITRATE”
With the judgment n. 18319 of 2012, filed on October 25, 2012, the First Civil Section of the Supreme Court, President Dr. Maria Gabriella Luccioli, has established the invalidity of the arbitration clause in employment relations implied by professionals.
