SULL’INTERPELLO AL MINISTERO DEL LAVORO N. 1/2013
Il ministero del Lavoro, a seguito di un'istanza di interpello presentata dalle associazioni del Movimento cooperativo Agci, Confcooperative, Legacoop, ha fornito, con la risposta n. 1/2013 del 24.01.2013,
Clear separation between fixed-term contracts and administration
In order to understand the scope of the judgment of 11 April 2013 EU Court of Justice, a brief introduction has to be made.The case concerns an employee who had agreed to three successive contracts with Obiettivo Lavoro Spa on fixed-term employment, in virtue of which was made available to the Poste Italiane as postmen in order to provide for replacement of the missing personnel assigned to delivery service at the Campania region.
Netta separazione tra contratto a termine e somministrazione
Per comprendere la portata della sentenza dell'11 aprile 2013 della Corte di Giustizia dell'UE deve essere fatta una breve premessa.La vicenda, riguarda un lavoratore che aveva concluso con Obiettivo Lavoro Spa tre contratti di lavoro a tempo determinato successivi, in forza dei quali era stato messo a disposizione delle Poste Italiane come portalettere al fine di provvedere alla sostituzione del personale assente addetto al servizio recapito presso la regione Campania.
REMARKS AT THE DECREE EX ART. 99 L. F. OF THE COURT OF GENOA BETWEEN BANKRUPTCY AND FAMILY THERE ARE CONDITIONAL CREDITS
The Decree of the Court of Genoa that we are going to comment on, derives from origins of an opposition of insolvency of a bankruptcy.
Annual Conference on EU Labour Law
Impact of Economic Reformson Social RightsLatest Case Law from theEuropean CourtsTrier, 21 March / 22 March 2013
THE DISMISSAL IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE
With this short description of framework there is of course the pretense to treat exhaustively the matter as complex as the systems of dismissal, in a comparative perspective.
EXTRACT FROM ORDINANCE NO. 19907 OF 2009 ISSUED BY THE EXAMINING MAGISTRATE GIUSEPPE DI SALVO OF SECTION III OF THE CIVIL COURT OF ROME
On the subject concerning the use of Arbitrator panels within associations I have the pleasure of sharing with you some reflections and I'm bringing them to your attention and hope may contribute to our company.
REMARKS OF THE JUDGMENT OF THE FIRST CIVIL SECTION OF SUPREME COURT NO. 18319 OF 2012 “THE SUPREME COURT DOES NOT WANT TO ARBITRATE”
With the judgment n. 18319 of 2012, filed on October 25, 2012, the First Civil Section of the Supreme Court, President Dr. Maria Gabriella Luccioli, has established the invalidity of the arbitration clause in employment relations implied by professionals.
National AGI Conference
Avvocati giuslavoristi italianiAncona, Mole Vanvitelliana26/27 of October 2012
Convegno nazionale AGI
Avvocati giuslavoristi italianiAncona, Mole Vanvitelliana26/27 ottobre 2012